EPSTEIN
page 2 / 325 . OCR, unverified
To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: JP visit
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 00:09:13 +0000
Mr. Dennis visit today was great I gave him a full tour of the Island, I prepared lunch and we chatted about the
Island and the Beach.
His ideas are basically the same as Ron but less intense. Ron wanted a minute by minute schedule on what
everyone is suppose to do, JP thinks everyone just needs a schedule with an issued time limit and he did say that
the beach needs to be raked twice a week for the sun to kill the eggs hidden under the sand.
We had a blast,
Ann R.
On Sep 21, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Jeffrey Epstein leevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
how did jp do? any ideas?
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jea®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00663296
--- SOURCE: 0228__EFTA00663297.txt ---
METADATA_SOURCE: 0228
METADATA_FILENAME: EFTA00663297.pdf
----------------------------------------
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen
Subject: October 16 update
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:30:45 +0000
October, 2013
Article 1.
The Wall Street Journal
Four Possible Deals with Iran
Amos Yadlin and Avner Golov
Article 2.
Foreign Policy
Democrats, Israel Lobby Threaten Iran Talks
Yochi Dreazen, John Hudson
Article 3.
Bloomberg
Five Things You Need to Know About the Iran Nuclear
Talks
Jeffrey Goldberg
Article 4.
Al Jazeera
Reinforcing US Middle East policy
Edward P. Djerejian
Article 5.
Politico
America's role in the world
Michael O'Hanlon and Jeremy Shapiro
Article 6.
The Huffington Post
Palestinians in a Jewish State
Nadim Nashif
Article 7.
Bloomberg
Enough Already With the Worrying About America's Jews
J.J. Goldberg
Arncic 1
The Wall Street Journal
Four Possible Deals with Iran
Amos Yadlin and Avner Golov
October 16 - Hopes are running high in many quarters that the West and
Iran could begin to work out a deal over the Iranian nuclear program this
week in Geneva. As the Iranian deputy foreign minister, Abbas Araqchi,
EFTA00663297
--- PAGE 2 ---
put it before the negotiations began on Tuesday: "We need to move
towards a trust-building road map with the Westerners." Such sweet talk—
and the White House's strong desire to avoid a confrontation with Tehran—
could result in a dangerous deal that would lift international sanctions on
Iran without ensuring an end to the Islamic Republic's nuclear-weapons
program.
This is not to say that any diplomatic solution would be a bad deal for the
West. A diplomatic solution is welcome if it actually offers a better
alternative than the two current options: bombing Iran's nuclear program or
accepting Iran with a nuclear weapon.
We see four types of potential deals that the six major powers currently
gathered in Geneva could make with Iran: an ideal agreement, a reasonable
agreement, a bad agreement and an agreement in phases.
The ideal agreement for the so-called P5+1 (the permanent United Nations
Security Council members—the U.S., Russia, China, the U.K. and France
—plus Germany) consists of an Iranian commitment to dismantle its
nuclear program. Tehran would stop enrichment at all levels—even for
nonmilitary purposes. It would close Fordow, its underground enrichment
facility, and the Arak reactor, which is capable of producing plutonium for
a bomb. Iran would also have to ship out its entire stockpile of enriched
uranium, which today is enough to produce five to seven bombs.
Such an agreement would meet the stipulated demands of the Security
Council, as well as prior demands by the U.S. and Israel. In exchange, the
West would lift all sanctions on Iran. A less good, but still reasonable,
agreement would be a compromise that meticulously addresses the critical
elements of Iran's nuclear program. Iran would retain its right to enrich
uranium, but only to a low 3.5%-5% nonmilitary grade.
This agreement would put clear limits on Iran's centrifuges. The country,
which currently has more than 19,000, would be allowed to keep a small,
symbolic number to prove that Iran has the presumptive right to enrich for
nonmilitary purposes. It would also cap the amount of enriched material,
which the International Atomic Energy Agency would oversee. To ensure
this, Iran would have to re-sign and implement the additional protocol,
which would enable the IAEA to carry out much more thorough
inspections. The Iranians would also have to guarantee that the Arak
reactor is not functional. Fordow would be closed, and all Iranian nuclear